I have no idea who wrote this but it sure makes
sense… I would have asked how can he be traveling and giving speeches all
the time and taking vacations and at the same time be doing anything
real!!!

The NoBull Newsletter

Who's Really Running the Show?

I have been having a nagging intuition lately that
something is not quite right about Barack Obama. I am not suggesting there
is something wrong with the man, per se. Nor am I talking about the crazy,
even dangerous, policies coming out of the White House. No, lately, I have
been wondering if Barack Obama is, in fact, the person who is actually
functioning as President of the United States .

I mean, there's no doubt that he fills the position
of POTUS but is he really the one in command? The man actually seems lost
at times. He seems to be reacting to ideas about which he does not really
have a clue. He has left the writing of this health care bill to Nancy
Pelosi's House of Representatives and she, in turn, has farmed the writing
out to several fairly radical community action groups. When questioned
about health care, he seems not to know or understand the details and even
with his silver-tongue seems unable to demonstrate any leadership on the
issue.

With respect to Afghanistan and the rest of our
foreign policy, he seems equally lost. Especially when it comes to dealing
with other world leaders. He makes beautiful speeches but seems to be
unable to cut deals which benefit our nation. He seems to be acting as a
pawn of much more clever world leaders.

The more I watch the man, the more I see a person who
appears to be the "face" of some other entity or group. He seems like a
"front man". And it is becoming clear that his strings are being pulled by
someone else. He does not appear to be the man in command of the ship of
state. At least, he is not in the driver's seat.

You might recall that people said about Bush that he
was a front man for the neo-cons and that it was really Dick Cheney that
was running the show. It turns out that Dick Cheney was not as influential
in Bush's second term as many thought but, perhaps it is true that the
neo-cons, whoever they may be, were pulling some of Bush's strings.

On the other hand, with Obama, it does not appear
that there is anyone who is visible to we the people or the media who is
pulling the strings. If they are there, they are not in elected positions
as Cheney was. They are better hidden than that.

We know that he has been and remains surrounded by
life-long radicals, professed communists and anti-capitalists, some of
whom he has even appointed as czars in his administration. Thirty six
czars, to date. But is it Obama who is picking the czars or is it the
czars who are running the show and propping up Obama as their front man?

I know all this may sound crazy but, really, when
you look at the man without the idolatry and media worship, does he really
look like he knows what he is doing? Does he seem to have a direction?
Firm convictions? Something he deeply believes in? The more he talks
now, the more his words seems empty of content. Platitudes about America
and the American people which, when he says them, simply do not ring true.
They are words being mouthed but not believed by him.

Okay, so maybe he is really clever, is firmly moving
the ship to the left while mouthing the words of a centrist but I don't
think so. What I used to think was that he was a really slick conman who
was making us watch his left hand while he was manipulating us with his
right. But, now I don't think that so much. I think the man is more
plastic than real. Now I begin to see him as the "Great and Powerful Oz":
a fearsome presence who is being manipulated by men behind the curtain.
And while Obama does not have strong convictions, the men behind the
curtain do. And they are moving this country down a dangerous path. All
the while, we are being distracted by Obama and what he says and does.

Okay, maybe I am simply a mildly paranoid conspiracy
theorist. Why, you might ask, have Obama up there? Why not have one of
the actual people behind the curtain run for President. Well, being a
paranoid conspiracy theorist, I can come up with an answer to that
question. Those other people behind the curtain have backgrounds that are
so radical that they would never have made it past the first few days of a
campaign. Additionally, they are life-long community organizers and they
know what kind of face can be effective if you wish to radically change the
nation. First, you need a black man to gain the support of the vast black
minority. Second, you need a pale skinned black man so as not to be too
much of a threat to white Americans. For the same reasons, you need a
mixed race man who allies himself with the poor and down-trodden. And you
need someone who speaks well enough to co-opt the language of the right and
appear to be a uniter, not a divider. Someone who sees, or at least can
articulate, both sides of an issue. This is the kind of man you would
pick to be your front man so that while you move things drastically and
dramatically left, the vast majority of Americans will not believe that was
the intention of the moderate appearing front man.

Yes, Obama was a community organizer. Yes, he could
be clever enough to have all this be his idea. But he really wasn't a
community organizer for that long. And when he was, he didn't do anything
truly radical. It was more a time during which he was being trained than a
time when he was driven by a personal sense of commitment to anything in
particular. There are people who are now in his government who have been
community organizers and radical left wing activists for 20-30 years.
These people have deeply ingrained commitments to changing the system and
have been actively trying to do so for all that time. Obama is not one of
them.

In my view, Obama has been trained and used as a
puppet by others for a long time. His successes seem to have come too
easily, as if they have been orchestrated. His life appears to have been
pre-planned. I mean, Harvard Law Review without publishing a single paper
of note. That is unusual. A community organizer for a short time, a State
legislator for a few years, a freshman US Senator, a convention key-note
speaker, and then POTUS. How does that happen? A person with zero
governmental administrative experience is running the entire government of
the United States .

How do 1100 page documents get developed and put out
in such short order? Who is writing all these proposals? Does it not seem
that something is just not quite right here? Forget about the specifics of
the policies for the moment. Have you seen this level of activity in the
first few months of any other administration in your lifetime? Does Obama
seem like the kind of person that could manage this level of activity in so
short a time? Too much does not make sense here.

So, slowly but surely, I am becoming convinced that
it is not Barack Obama who is running the show. The White House has been
captured by a group of people who are using Barack Obama as their front
man. He is nothing but an articulate but empty suit. We have to start
looking behind the curtains to find out who is really controlling the
"great and powerful Obama".

Something to think about..............





OBITUARY


Born 1776, Died 2008

It does not hurt to read this several times.


Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law,
St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning last
November's Presidential election:

a.. Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
b.. Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143
million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the
country.

Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low
income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
"complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already
having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million
criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye
to the USA in fewer than five years.

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this
message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just
how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our
freedom.